Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy S III
LTE 2 GB RAMGT-I9305
| Global Score | |
| 74.8 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| Android 4.3, 4.1.2, 4.1.1, 4.0.4 | Android 11 |
| 2012-05-03 | 2021-04-02 |
| 5.38 x 2.78 x 0.34 inches | 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches |
| 4.69 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Brown, Gray, Pink, Red and White | Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue |
| Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 195.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.8 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 306 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| 300 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 4 (4412) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A9 (Quad-Core 1400 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-400 MP4 (Quad-Core 266 MHz) GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9 | 9.9 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.56 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 1.90 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 8.47 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2100mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 580 hours standby time 16 hours talk time | -- |
| 4 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The vivo X60 Pro is a little bit better than the Galaxy S III, getting a overall score of 78.8 against 74.8. Both phones in our current comparison include Android operating system, but vivo X60 Pro has newer 11 version and Galaxy S III has Android 4.3, providing the user lots of additional features and improved performance. Although the vivo X60 Pro is way heavier than the Galaxy S III, it's somewhat thinner and extremely newer.
The vivo X60 Pro has a better performing CPU than Galaxy S III, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics processor, it also counts with more processing cores and more RAM. The Samsung Galaxy S III features a little more vivid screen than vivo X60 Pro, although it has a quite lower screen pixels density, a lot worse resolution of 1280 x 720 pixels and a lot smaller display.
The vivo X60 Pro shoots much better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy S III, because it has a lot bigger sensor providing a lot better image quality, a lot larger camera aperture to capture better captures in low light environments, a back camera with a way better 48 mega pixels resolution and a way higher 3840x2160 video quality.
Vivo X60 Pro has a much greater storage to store more apps and games than Galaxy S III, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage. The vivo X60 Pro has a much longer battery duration than Galaxy S III, because it has 4200mAh of battery capacity instead of 2100mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.