Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy S III mini
8 GB AT&T LTE NFCG730A
| Global Score | |
| 63.2 | 68.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 4.1.2, 4.1.1 | Android 10 |
| 2012-10-11 | 2020-07-15 |
| 4.78 x 2.48 x 0.39 inches | 6.49 x 3.03 x 0.35 inches |
| 4.23 ounces | 6.91 ounces |
| Blue and White | Carbon grey, Ocean green and Sky blue |
| -- | Plastic |
| $ 145.00 | $ 126.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 480 x 800 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 233 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.6 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| STE U8420 chipset | MediaTek Helio G25 chipset |
| Dual-Core 1200 MHz processor | Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-400 MP1 (320 MHz) GPU | PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 8.1 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 8 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 4.62 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP + 0.30 MP | 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| 1280 x 720 (30 fps) (HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 6.71 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2000mAh Li-Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 370 hours standby time 11 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi 9A has a general score of 68.2, which is a little bit better than the Galaxy S III mini's general score of 63.2. The Xiaomi Redmi 9A body is a lot newer and somewhat thinner than the Galaxy S III mini's, although it's also a lot heavier. Both phones in this comparison include Android operating system, but the Xiaomi Redmi 9A has the older 10 version while Galaxy S III mini has Android 4.1.2.
Xiaomi Redmi 9A counts with a quite better processing power than Galaxy S III mini, because although it has doesn't have a graphics processing unit, it also counts with a greater number of cores (and also faster) and more RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy S III mini features a little more vivid screen than Xiaomi Redmi 9A, although it has a little bit inferior pixel quantity per inch in the display, a way smaller screen and a way worse 800 x 480 resolution.
Xiaomi Redmi 9A features a much bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy S III mini, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 24 GB more internal memory. Xiaomi Redmi 9A counts with a much longer battery life than Galaxy S III mini, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 2000mAh.
Xiaomi Redmi 9A shoots greater pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy S III mini, because it has a lot better 1920x1080 video definition and a camera in the back with a way better 13 mega-pixels resolution.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, the Xiaomi Redmi 9A is also cheaper than the Samsung Galaxy S III mini, which makes it a very good choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.