Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 61.3 | 71.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 4.0 | Android 4.0 |
| 2012-09-06 | 0000-00-00 |
| 4.96 x 2.56 x 0.53 inches | 5.39 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.60 ounces | 4.72 ounces |
| -- | Black, Blue, Brown and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 100.00 | $ 100.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4 inches | 4.8 inches |
| 480 x 800 pixels | 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 233 pixels per inch | 306 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.7 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8260A chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 chipset |
| Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB (500 MHz) RAM | 2 GB (500 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU | Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU |
| 8.37 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 8 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 4.62 | 7.56 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP + 1.30 MP | 8.00 MP + 1.90 MP |
| -- | f/2.60 aperture |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 1280 x 720 (HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 5.94 | 8.47 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE (4G), EV-DO A and CDMA |
| SIM | Micro SIM |
| 4.6 | 5.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1800mAh Li-Ion Battery | 2100mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 312 hours standby time 10 hours talk time | 200 hours standby time 15 hours talk time |
| 3.68 | 4 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S III Cricket is much better than the Galaxy S Relay 4G, with a 71.5 score against 61.3. The Galaxy S III Cricket design is a lot thinner and somewhat lighter than the Galaxy S Relay 4G. Both phones in this comparison have the same Android 4.0 OS (operating system), so both should provide very similar OS features.
Galaxy S III Cricket features a little bit better hardware performance than Galaxy S Relay 4G, and although they both have a 400 megahertz graphics processing unit and a Dual-Core processor, the Galaxy S III Cricket also has 1 GB more RAM memory. Galaxy S III Cricket features a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy S Relay 4G, because it has a larger screen, a lot higher 1280 x 720 pixels resolution and a greater count of pixels per inch in the display.
Galaxy S III Cricket has a greater camera than Galaxy S Relay 4G, because it has a much higher video quality and a camera in the back with a way better 8 megapixels resolution. The Galaxy S III Cricket has a much greater memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy S Relay 4G, because it has a SD extension slot that admits up to 64 GB and 32 GB internal memory capacity.
Galaxy S III Cricket has just a little bit longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S Relay 4G, because it has 2100mAh of battery capacity.
Galaxy S III Cricket costs exactly the same than Galaxy S Relay 4G, which makes it easy to pick between these phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.