Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.6 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-05-16 | 2017-10-19 |
| 6.40 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches | 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Crown silver, Majestic black and Royal gold | Black, Blue and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 342.00 | $ 129.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5 inches |
| 3040 x 1440 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 502 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10 5G is better than the Google Pixel 2, with a general score of 93.6 against 81.6. Galaxy S10 5G's construction has the same thickness than the Google Pixel 2, but it is way heavier. Samsung Galaxy S10 5G features a bit faster processing unit than Google Pixel 2, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Samsung Galaxy S10 5G also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G has a bit sharper screen than Google Pixel 2, because it has a way higher 1440 x 3040 resolution, a little bit greater pixel density and a way bigger screen. Galaxy S10 5G features a little bit better camera than Google Pixel 2, because although it has a camera in the back with lesser mega pixels resolution and a worse (4K) video quality, it also counts with a larger camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a larger aperture.
Galaxy S10 5G counts with a lot bigger memory for applications and games than Google Pixel 2, because it has 256 GB internal storage. Galaxy S10 5G has a superior battery duration than Google Pixel 2, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Although Galaxy S10 5G is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Google Pixel 2, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Google Pixel 2. If you are trying to save some money, you can get the Google Pixel 2, giving up some specs and features, but you'll get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.