Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.6 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-05-16 | 2016-09-29 |
| 6.40 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches | 6.29 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Crown silver, Majestic black and Royal gold | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 342.00 | $ 115.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 3040 x 1440 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 502 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.63 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 29.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3200mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G has a general score of 93.6, which is way better than LG V20's 77 general score. The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G design is a lot newer, but just a little thicker and heavier than the LG V20. The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G has a little bit better performance than LG V20, because it has 4 more cores and a larger amount of RAM.
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G counts with a bit better looking screen than LG V20, because although it has a little lower screen pixel density, it also counts with a larger screen and a quite better 1440 x 3040 resolution. Galaxy S10 5G takes a bit better videos and photos than LG V20, because although it has a much less megapixels back camera and a lower (4K) video quality, it also counts with a bigger sensor taking higher quality videos and photos and a larger aperture to capture better low light photography and videos.
The LG V20 counts with a better storage capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy S10 5G, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with an external memory slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. Galaxy S10 5G features a way better battery performance than LG V20, because it has a 4500mAh battery size instead of 3200mAh.
Galaxy S10 5G is way more expensive than LG V20, but you can get a much better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.