Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.6 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2019-05-16 | 2024-08-08 |
| 6.40 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches | 6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Crown silver, Majestic black and Royal gold | Jungle Green, Koala Gray and Peach Fuzz |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 342.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3040 x 1440 pixels | 2712 x 1220 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 502 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 AE (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10 5G has a score of 93.6, which is better than Motorola Edge 50's 81.2 overall score. These phones include Android OS, but the Galaxy S10 5G has the older 11 version and Motorola Edge 50 has Android 14. Galaxy S10 5G is a a bit heavier phone than the Motorola Edge 50, but both are equally thin.
The Galaxy S10 5G counts with a lot better hardware performance than Motorola Edge 50. Both have the same RAM memory amount and a Octa-Core processing unit. Motorola Edge 50 has a bit sharper screen than Galaxy S10 5G, although it has a bit lower 1220 x 2712px resolution and a quite worse pixels density, they both have a same size screen.
The Motorola Edge 50's memory to install applications and games is very similar to the Samsung Galaxy S10 5G one, they have exactly the same internal storage capacity. Motorola Edge 50 counts with a bit longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy S10 5G, because it has an 11% larger battery capacity. The Motorola Edge 50 counts with a much better camera than Galaxy S10 5G, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture and worse 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the Motorola Edge 50 also counts with a way more megapixels back facing camera and a much bigger sensor.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.