Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.6 | 79.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-05-16 | 2020-04-16 |
| 6.40 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Crown silver, Majestic black and Royal gold | Mystic indigo |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 342.00 | $ 300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 3040 x 1440 pixels | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 502 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10 5G is much better than the Motorola Moto G Stylus, getting a score of 93.6 against 79.7. These devices include the same Android 11 OS. Galaxy S10 5G is an older and a little heavier cellphone than the Motorola Moto G Stylus, but Samsung managed to build it somewhat thinner anyway. Samsung Galaxy S10 5G features just a bit better hardware performance than Motorola Moto G Stylus, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy S10 5G also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
Galaxy S10 5G has a bit sharper screen than Moto G Stylus, because it has a better display density, a little larger screen and a better resolution of 1440 x 3040px. Motorola Moto G Stylus counts with just a bit bigger memory for games and applications than Galaxy S10 5G, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that admits up to 512 GB.
The Motorola Moto G Stylus shoots much better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy S10 5G, because although it has worse video frame rate and a tinier diafragm aperture which is not so good for shooting photographs in low-light situations, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Motorola Moto G Stylus also counts with a much bigger sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a lot higher resolution back camera.
Galaxy S10 5G counts with just a bit better battery duration than Moto G Stylus, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Galaxy S10 5G is a bit more expensive than Motorola Moto G Stylus, but you can get a better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.