Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.6 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Oppo |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-05-16 | 2021-03-30 |
| 6.40 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches | 6.43 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Crown silver, Majestic black and Royal gold | Blue and Gloss Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 342.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3040 x 1440 pixels | 3216 x 1440 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 502 pixels per inch | 526 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G is much better than the OPPO Find X3 Pro, getting a general score of 93.6 against 79.9. Samsung Galaxy S10 5G's design is a little bit thinner than OPPO Find X3 Pro, although it is just a little bit heavier and was released a little bit over a year before. Both of these phones include the same Android 11 operating system, so you shouldn't notice any differences regarding that.
OPPO Find X3 Pro counts with a bit more vivid display than Galaxy S10 5G, and although they both have a display with the same size, the OPPO Find X3 Pro also has a slightly better 1440 x 3216 resolution and a bit better pixels density. The OPPO Find X3 Pro has just a little better processing power than Galaxy S10 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Find X3 Pro also has 4 GB more RAM.
OPPO Find X3 Pro has as much storage capacity for games and applications as Galaxy S10 5G, both have the same internal memory. The OPPO Find X3 Pro has a much better camera than Galaxy S10 5G, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not so good for low light photography, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same video frame rates, the OPPO Find X3 Pro also counts with a much bigger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a lot higher 50 MP resolution back-facing camera.
OPPO Find X3 Pro features a battery life that is just as good as the Galaxy S10 5G one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.