Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.6 | 88 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-05-16 | 2020-08-06 |
| 6.40 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches | 6.27 x 2.93 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 7.16 ounces |
| Crown silver, Majestic black and Royal gold | Mirage black and Mirage blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 342.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3040 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 502 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10 5G is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy M31s, getting a 93.6 score against 88. These devices have the same Android 11 OS, so both of them should provide the same OS features. Despite of the fact that the Galaxy S10 5G is older than Samsung Galaxy M31s, it's design is thinner and just a little bit lighter.
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G has a slightly better display than Samsung Galaxy M31s, because it has a just a bit greater pixel density, a little bit larger screen and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3040. Samsung Galaxy S10 5G features a little bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy M31s, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Samsung Galaxy S10 5G also has more RAM memory.
The Galaxy M31s features a bit bigger storage for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S10 5G, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that admits up to 512 GB. The Galaxy M31s counts with improved battery performance than Galaxy S10 5G, because it has a 6000mAh battery size against 4500mAh.
The Galaxy M31s shoots much better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy S10 5G, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not nice for low-light captures and video and lower video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Galaxy M31s also counts with a lot bigger sensor providing a way better image quality and a lot higher 64 megapixels resolution camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.