Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.6 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2019-05-16 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.40 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Crown silver, Majestic black and Royal gold | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 342.00 | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 8 inches |
| 3040 x 1440 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 502 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G has an overall score of 93.6, which is much better than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro's score of 77.8. These phones use Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy S10 5G has an older 11 version and vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14 version. The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G construction is a little bit lighter than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it is a lot thicker and was released many years before.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a way better display than Galaxy S10 5G, because although it has a quite lower pixels density, it also counts with a quite better 2200 x 2480 resolution and a bigger screen. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a lot bigger storage for applications and games than Galaxy S10 5G, because it has 512 GB internal memory capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G features an extremely better processing unit than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has 8 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have 8 CPU cores. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a way better camera than Samsung Galaxy S10 5G, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not good for low light photos, it also counts with a lot bigger camera sensor providing a way better image quality, a way higher 50 mega pixels resolution camera and a much higher 7680x4320 video definition.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with greater battery performance than Galaxy S10 5G, because it has 5700mAh of battery capacity.
Galaxy S10 5G not only is the best devices of the ones we compare here, but it's also very cheap compared to the other devices, which makes it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.