Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.6 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-05-16 | 2021-04-02 |
| 6.40 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Crown silver, Majestic black and Royal gold | Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 342.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 3040 x 1440 pixels | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 502 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.9 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10 5G is better than vivo X60 Pro, getting a 93.6 score against 78.8. These devices have the same Android 11 OS (operating system), so you shouldn't notice any differences regarding OS features. Despite being the best in this comparison review, it must be told that it's also older, a bit thicker and just a little heavier.
The vivo X60 Pro has just a little better processing power than Galaxy S10 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the vivo X60 Pro also has more RAM memory. Galaxy S10 5G has just a bit better screen than vivo X60 Pro, because it has a quite bigger screen, a higher 1440 x 3040 pixels resolution and more pixels per inch of display.
The Galaxy S10 5G and the vivo X60 Pro both feature incredibly similar storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos, both have the same internal storage. The Galaxy S10 5G counts with a bit superior battery performance than vivo X60 Pro, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
The vivo X60 Pro takes better photographs and videos than Galaxy S10 5G, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture, and they both have the same 60 fps video frame rates and the same video resolution, the vivo X60 Pro also counts with a lot larger back camera sensor shooting lot higher quality pictures and videos and a much higher 48 mega-pixels resolution camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.