Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89.7 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| 2020-02-03 | 2015-11-02 |
| 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches | 6.27 x 3.06 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.28 ounces |
| Prism black, Prism blue and Prism white | Black, Gold, Silver and White |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 279.00 | $ 649.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED Plus | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 430 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3450mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10 Lite is much better than the Google Nexus 6P, getting an 89.7 score against 80.3. Although the Galaxy S10 Lite is noticeably newer than Google Nexus 6P, it is a little bit thicker and just a little bit heavier. The Google Nexus 6P counts with a little more vivid display than Galaxy S10 Lite, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per inch of screen and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels.
Galaxy S10 Lite counts with a bit more powerful processing unit than Google Nexus 6P, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy S10 Lite also has 5 GB more RAM. The Galaxy S10 Lite features a much bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than Google Nexus 6P, and although they both have equal internal memory capacity, the Galaxy S10 Lite also has a SD card slot that allows up to 1000 GB.
Galaxy S10 Lite counts with greater battery performance than Google Nexus 6P, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 3450mAh. Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite has a much better camera than Google Nexus 6P, and although they both have a same size diafragm aperture and the same (4K) video quality, the Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite also has a larger camera sensor, better 60 fps video frame rate and a way more megapixels back facing camera.
Despite of being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, the Galaxy S10 Lite is also a bargain compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.