Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89.7 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| 2020-02-03 | 2017-10-19 |
| 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches | 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Prism black, Prism blue and Prism white | Black, Blue and White |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 279.00 | $ 129.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED Plus | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite is better than the Google Pixel 2, having a score of 89.7 against 81.6. Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite's construction is way newer, but just a bit thicker and much heavier than Google Pixel 2. Google Pixel 2 features a bit sharper screen than Galaxy S10 Lite, because although it has a really smaller display and a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 1920px, it also counts with a little bit more pixels per screen inch.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite counts with a bit faster CPU than Google Pixel 2, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite also has more RAM memory. Galaxy S10 Lite has much more storage capacity to store more games and applications than Google Pixel 2, and although they both have equal internal memory capacity, the Galaxy S10 Lite also has a slot for SD memory cards that supports up to 1000 GB.
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite counts with a lot better camera than Google Pixel 2, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not favorable for capturing photos or video in low-light environments, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite also counts with faster 60 frames per second video frame rates, a much bigger back-facing camera sensor shooting lot better quality photographs and a much more mega pixels camera.
The Galaxy S10 Lite has a superior battery performance than Google Pixel 2, because it has a 67% more battery capacity.
Although Galaxy S10 Lite is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Google Pixel 2, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Google Pixel 2. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy the Galaxy S10 Lite, else you can save some money and buy the Google Pixel 2, letting go some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.