Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89.7 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| 2020-02-03 | 2016-10-20 |
| 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches | 6.09 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Prism black, Prism blue and Prism white | Black, Blue and Gray |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 279.00 | $ 869.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED Plus | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.63 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3450mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10 Lite is better than Google Pixel XL, with an 89.7 score against 81.3. The Galaxy S10 Lite construction is way newer and just a little thinner than Google Pixel XL's, but it's just a little heavier. Galaxy S10 Lite features a bit superior processing unit than Google Pixel XL, because it has 4 GB more RAM memory and a greater number of cores.
Google Pixel XL has a slightly better display than Galaxy S10 Lite, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better pixel quantity per inch of screen and a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution. Galaxy S10 Lite captures way better videos and photos than Google Pixel XL, and although they both have a same size diafragm aperture and the same video quality, the Galaxy S10 Lite also has a back-facing camera with way more megapixels, higher 60 frames per second video frame rates and a larger back camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite counts with a way bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than Google Pixel XL, and although they both have the same internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite also has a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 1000 GB. The Galaxy S10 Lite counts with better battery lifetime than Google Pixel XL, because it has a 30% more battery capacity.
Galaxy S10 Lite is not only the best phones in our current comparison, but it's also by far the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.