Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89.7 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-02-03 | 2019-05-10 |
| 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Prism black, Prism blue and Prism white | Aurora black |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 279.00 | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10 Lite is a little bit better than the LG V50 ThinQ, getting a general score of 89.7 against 83.7. Even though the Galaxy S10 Lite and the LG V50 ThinQ were only released with a couple months difference, Galaxy S10 Lite's construction is a little bit heavier but just a little thinner. LG V50 ThinQ features a slightly better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 3120 and a better pixel density.
LG V50 ThinQ features a better memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy S10 Lite, and although they both have the same internal storage, the LG V50 ThinQ also has an external memory slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. LG V50 ThinQ's CPU is very similar to the Galaxy S10 Lite one, and although the LG V50 ThinQ has lesser RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
Galaxy S10 Lite counts with just a little better battery lifetime than LG V50 ThinQ, because it has a 13 percent bigger battery size. Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite takes much better photographs and videos than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has a much smaller camera aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same 60 frames per second video frame rate, the Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite also counts with a way larger back camera sensor taking way higher quality videos and photographs and a back facing camera with way more mega-pixels.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite costs a little more money than the LG V50 ThinQ, but it's still a good choice, because you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.