Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89.7 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2020-02-03 | 2014-10-28 |
| 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Prism black, Prism blue and Prism white | Black and Blue |
| Glass and Metal | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 279.00 | $ 179.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED Plus | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite is better than the Motorola Droid Turbo, with an 89.7 score against 76.4. The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite design is extremely newer and way thinner, but also just a little heavier than the Motorola Droid Turbo. Motorola Droid Turbo features a sharper display than Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite, because although it has a lot smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels and a higher pixels amount in each inch in the screen.
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite has a way bigger memory to store more apps and games than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has a slot for external memory cards that holds up to 1000 GB and more internal storage capacity. Galaxy S10 Lite counts with a little faster CPU than Motorola Droid Turbo, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics processing unit, it also counts with 4 more CPU cores and more RAM.
The Galaxy S10 Lite has a little longer battery duration than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity. The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite shoots way better pictures and videos than Motorola Droid Turbo, and although they both have the same video quality and a same size diafragm aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite also has a lot higher resolution back camera and faster 60 frames per second video frame rates.
The Galaxy S10 Lite is a lot more expensive than the Motorola Droid Turbo, but it's still a good choice, because you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.