Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89.7 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2020-02-03 | 2014-10-28 |
| 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Prism black, Prism blue and Prism white | Black and Blue |
| Glass and Metal | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 279.00 | $ 135.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED Plus | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite has a global score of 89.7, which is much better than Motorola DROID Turbo's 77.9 general score. Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite is a notably newer and incredibly thinner cellphone than Motorola DROID Turbo, but it is also just a little bit heavier. The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite counts with a bit faster processor than Motorola DROID Turbo, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics processing unit, it also counts with a higher number of cores and a higher amount of RAM memory.
Motorola DROID Turbo has a better display than Galaxy S10 Lite, because although it has a lot smaller screen, it also counts with a greater display density and a higher 2560 x 1440 pixels resolution. The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite features a lot better camera than Motorola DROID Turbo, and although they both have the same (4K) video resolution and a F2 aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite also has a back facing camera with a way better 48 megapixels resolution and better video frame rates.
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite features a lot bigger storage to store more apps and games than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has an external memory slot that admits a maximum of 1000 GB and 64 GB more internal storage. The Galaxy S10 Lite has a little better battery performance than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has a 15% bigger battery size.
Galaxy S10 Lite is a lot more expensive than Motorola DROID Turbo, but you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.