Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89.7 | 79.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-02-03 | 2020-04-16 |
| 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches | 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Prism black, Prism blue and Prism white | Mystic indigo |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Plastic |
| $ 279.00 | $ 300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10 Lite has an overall score of 89.7, which is better than Motorola Moto G Stylus's global score of 79.7. The Galaxy S10 Lite construction is a little bit lighter and thinner than the Motorola Moto G Stylus, although both were only released with a couple months difference. Galaxy S10 Lite has a little better hardware performance than Motorola Moto G Stylus, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S10 Lite also has more RAM memory.
Galaxy S10 Lite has a slightly better looking screen than Moto G Stylus, because although it has a little worse count of pixels per inch in the display, it also counts with a quite larger screen and a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400px. Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite counts with a slightly bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Moto G Stylus, and although they both have equal internal memory, the Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite also has a slot for external memory cards that holds up to 1000 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite features a little bit better camera than Moto G Stylus, because although it has a smaller aperture which is worse for shooting pictures and videos in low light environments, and they both have the same resolution back-facing camera, the same (4K) video definition and a 0.5 inches sensor, the Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite also counts with higher 60 fps video frame rate.
The Galaxy S10 Lite has just a bit better battery life than Moto G Stylus, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite not only is the best phones of the ones in this comparison, but it's also cheap compared to the other phone.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.