Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89.7 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-02-03 | 2019-06-06 |
| 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches | 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 5.82 ounces |
| Prism black, Prism blue and Prism white | Gray and White |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 279.00 | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10 Lite has a score of 89.7, which is much better than the Motorola Moto Z4's global score of 79.8. Although it's the best in this review, Galaxy S10 Lite is a heavier and just a bit thicker phone than Motorola Moto Z4. The Galaxy S10 Lite features a bit more vivid screen than Moto Z4, because although it has a little bit lower display pixels density, it also counts with a quite better 1080 x 2400 resolution and a quite bigger display.
The Galaxy S10 Lite features a bit superior CPU than Motorola Moto Z4, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S10 Lite also has a larger amount of RAM. The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite features a bit better camera than Moto Z4, because although it has a smaller aperture which is worse for taking photos in low-light environments, and they both have a same resolution camera, the same camera sensor size and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite also counts with better 60 fps video frame rate.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite counts with a slightly bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than Moto Z4, and although they both have the same internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite also has an external memory card slot that allows a maximum of 1000 GB. Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite features greater battery performance than Moto Z4, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity against 3600mAh.
Even being the best phone in this comparison, Galaxy S10 Lite is also very cheap compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.