Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89.7 | 84.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android |
| 2020-02-03 | 2021-01-22 |
| 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Prism black, Prism blue and Prism white | Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white |
| Glass and Metal | Metal and Plastic |
| $ 279.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | TFT |
| 393 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.99 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10 Lite is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy A32, having an 89.7 score against 84.7. The Galaxy S10 Lite is an older cellphone than Samsung Galaxy A32, but it's just a little lighter and somewhat thinner anyway. The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite features a much better display than Galaxy A32, because it has a bit larger display, a much better resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a better number of pixels per screen inch.
Galaxy S10 Lite counts with a bit better CPU than Samsung Galaxy A32, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S10 Lite also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The Galaxy S10 Lite takes much better videos and photos than Galaxy A32, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is worse for low-light captures and video, and they both have a back-facing camera with a 48 mega pixels and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Galaxy S10 Lite also counts with higher 60 frames per second video frame rates.
The Galaxy S10 Lite has more storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy A32, because although it has a SD memory slot that holds 24 GB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage. The Galaxy A32 has just a bit longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.