Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89.7 | 82.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo |
| 2020-02-03 | 2018-08-27 |
| 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches | 6.39 x 3.03 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Prism black, Prism blue and Prism white | Black and White |
| Glass and Metal | Glass and Metal |
| $ 279.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 392 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 512 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.99 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10 Lite is a bit better than the Galaxy A8 Star, with an 89.7 score against 82.1. Even though the Galaxy S10 Lite is just a little bit thicker than the Galaxy A8 Star, it's a little bit lighter and newer. Galaxy S10 Lite has a little more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy A8 Star, because it has a little bit better screen pixel density, a slightly higher 1080 x 2400px resolution and a little bigger display.
Galaxy S10 Lite has a very superior memory capacity to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A8 Star, because it has 64 GB more internal storage capacity and an external memory slot that holds up to 1000 GB. Galaxy S10 Lite features a bit superior processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A8 Star, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy S10 Lite also has a greater amount of RAM.
The Galaxy S10 Lite has longer battery life than Galaxy A8 Star, because it has a 4500mAh battery size against 3700mAh. The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite has a much better camera than Galaxy A8 Star, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not so good for taking photos in low-light environments, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite also counts with a back camera with a lot better resolution, a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor which provides a lot better image and video quality and faster video frame rates.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.