Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89.7 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2020-02-03 | 2017-02-24 |
| 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches | 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Prism black, Prism blue and Prism white | Black and Gold |
| Glass and Metal | Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 279.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED Plus | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 510 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.99 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10 Lite is much better than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, getting a general score of 89.7 against 81. The Galaxy S10 Lite design is extremely newer and just a little lighter, but also somewhat thicker than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro. The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite features a little bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a little larger display, a little higher 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution and a just a bit better pixel density.
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite counts with a much bigger memory for apps and games than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that holds up to 1000 GB and 128 GB internal storage. Galaxy S10 Lite has a little bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy S10 Lite also has a higher amount of RAM.
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite has a little better battery life than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity. Galaxy S10 Lite takes way better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not nice for low-light photos, it also counts with a camera in the back with a way better resolution and a much higher 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.