Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89.7 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2020-02-03 | 2021-04-02 |
| 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches | 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Prism black, Prism blue and Prism white | Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue |
| Glass and Metal | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 279.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.99 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10 Lite is much better than the vivo X60 Pro, with a score of 89.7 against 78.8. Galaxy S10 Lite is an older, just a bit thicker and just a bit heavier device than the vivo X60 Pro. Vivo X60 Pro features a bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite, because although it has a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2376px and a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a just a bit greater pixels quantity in each display inch.
The vivo X60 Pro counts with a bit better processing unit than Galaxy S10 Lite, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the vivo X60 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The Galaxy S10 Lite counts with a greater memory capacity for games and applications than vivo X60 Pro, because although it has just 128 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that supports a maximum of 1000 GB.
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite features a bit better battery lifetime than vivo X60 Pro, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 4200mAh. The Galaxy S10 Lite has a slightly better camera than vivo X60 Pro, although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is worse for low light photography and videos, they both have the same 60 frames per second video frame rate, a 48 megapixels camera, the same sensor size and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.