Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.3 | 79.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-03-08 | 2017-09-21 |
| 5.90 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.54 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green and Prism white | Black, Blue, Purple and Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 281.00 | $ 307.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6 inches |
| 3040 x 1440 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 551 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.36 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10 has an overall score of 88.3, which is better than LG V30's 79.1 global score. The Galaxy S10 construction is newer and just a little bit lighter than LG V30's, but it is also just a little bit thicker. The Samsung Galaxy S10 features a little better performance than LG V30, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy S10 also has a larger amount of RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 has a slightly better screen than LG V30, because it has a little bigger display, a quite greater display pixel density and a bit higher resolution of 1440 x 3040 pixels. The LG V30 counts with a little bit better storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy S10, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with an external memory card slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Samsung Galaxy S10 counts with a bit superior battery lifetime than LG V30, because it has 3400mAh of battery capacity against 3300mAh. Galaxy S10 features a little bit better camera than LG V30, because although it has a lot less megapixels resolution camera and a worse video resolution, it also counts with a larger aperture for better low-light photography and a larger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 is not only the best devices in our comparison, but it's also the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.