Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.3 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-03-08 | 2019-05-10 |
| 5.90 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.54 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green and Prism white | Aurora black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 281.00 | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 3040 x 1440 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 551 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.36 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S10 is a little bit better than LG V50 ThinQ, with an 88.3 score against 83.7. These phones include Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy S10 has 11 version while LG V50 ThinQ has Android 10. The Samsung Galaxy S10 is a just a bit thinner and lighter cellphone than the LG V50 ThinQ, even when they were released only 2 months apart.
Samsung Galaxy S10 features a bit sharper display than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has a quite lower resolution of 1440 x 3040 pixels and a little smaller screen, it also counts with a just a bit greater pixels density. LG V50 ThinQ has a much bigger memory capacity for apps and games than Galaxy S10, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage, the LG V50 ThinQ also has a slot for an external memory card that supports up to 1,95 TB.
The LG V50 ThinQ and Galaxy S10 have incredibly similar processing units, and although the LG V50 ThinQ has 2 GB lesser RAM, they both have 8 CPU cores. LG V50 ThinQ features superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy S10, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity. The LG V50 ThinQ and Galaxy S10 have very similar cameras, and although the LG V50 ThinQ has a smaller sensor capturing worse quality photographs, they both have the same video frame rate, a F1.5 camera aperture, the same (4K) video resolution and a 12 megapixels resolution camera.
The Galaxy S10 is more expensive than the LG V50 ThinQ, but it's still a convenient choice, because you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.