Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.3 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2019-03-08 | 2024-08-08 |
| 5.90 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches | 6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.54 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green and Prism white | Jungle Green, Koala Gray and Peach Fuzz |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 281.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3040 x 1440 pixels | 2712 x 1220 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 551 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 AE (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.36 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10 is just a bit better than the Motorola Edge 50, getting an 88.3 score against 81.2. These devices use Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy S10 has the previous 11 version while Motorola Edge 50 has Android 14 version. Galaxy S10's body has the same thickness than Motorola Edge 50, but it is somewhat lighter.
Motorola Edge 50 counts with a bit better looking screen than Galaxy S10, because although it has a just a little lower display pixels density and a little worse 1220 x 2712 resolution, it also counts with a little bigger display. Galaxy S10 has slightly more storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola Edge 50, because although it has just 128 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that allows up to 512 GB.
The Galaxy S10 counts with a very superior processing power than Motorola Edge 50. Both have a Octa-Core processing unit and 8 GB of RAM. Motorola Edge 50 captures better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S10, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not nice for capturing photographs or videos in low light situations and lower video frame rates, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the Motorola Edge 50 also counts with a way larger back-facing camera sensor which gives a much better image and video quality and a way higher 50 mega pixels resolution camera in the back.
The Motorola Edge 50 counts with a much longer battery performance than Galaxy S10, because it has a 47% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.