Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.3 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-03-08 | 2019-06-06 |
| 5.90 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches | 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.54 ounces | 5.82 ounces |
| Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green and Prism white | Gray and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 281.00 | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 3040 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 551 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.36 | 5.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S10 is much better than the Moto Z4, getting a overall score of 88.3 against 79.8. Both of these phones use Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy S10 has newer 11 version and Moto Z4 has Android 10, so it gives some nice extra features. Even though Samsung Galaxy S10 and the Moto Z4 were released with only a few months difference, the Samsung Galaxy S10 body is a little bit thicker but a little bit lighter.
Samsung Galaxy S10 features a more vivid screen than Moto Z4, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a greater pixel number per screen inch and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3040px. Galaxy S10 counts with a bit superior CPU than Motorola Moto Z4, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy S10 also has 4 GB more RAM.
Moto Z4 and Samsung Galaxy S10 both feature very similar memory for applications, games, photos and videos, both of them have exactly the same internal memory capacity and a SD memory slot that holds up to 512 GB. Motorola Moto Z4 has a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy S10, because although it has lower video frame rate and a tinier camera aperture which is not favorable for low light captures and video, and they both have the same video quality, the Motorola Moto Z4 also counts with a much better 48 MP resolution camera and a much bigger sensor which provides a way better image and video quality.
Moto Z4 features just a bit better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S10, because it has a 6% more battery size.
The Galaxy S10 not only is the best devices of the ones in this comparison, but it's also a lot cheaper, making this phone a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.