Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.3 | 84.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-03-08 | 2019-05-29 |
| 5.90 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches | 6.50 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches |
| 5.54 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green and Prism white | Angel gold, Ghost white and Phantom black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 281.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3040 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 551 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.36 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10 is a bit better than Galaxy A80, with an 88.3 score against 84.9. The Galaxy S10 is a extremely lighter and somewhat thinner cellphone than the Galaxy A80, even when both of them were released only 3 months apart. Samsung Galaxy S10 features a bit more powerful processor than Galaxy A80. Both have the same number of cores and a 8 GB RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 features a much better display than Samsung Galaxy A80, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher pixel density and a better resolution of 1440 x 3040 pixels. Samsung Galaxy S10 has a much greater storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A80, and although they both have equal internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy S10 also has a slot for external memory cards that admits up to 512 GB.
Samsung Galaxy A80 counts with a little better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S10, because it has a 3700mAh battery size instead of 3400mAh. The Galaxy A80 captures a bit better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S10, because although it has worse video frame rates and a lot smaller diafragm aperture which is not favorable for taking images or videos in low light situations, and they both have the same (4K) video definition, the Galaxy A80 also counts with a way better resolution camera in the back and a way bigger sensor shooting much better quality videos and pictures.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.