Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.3 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-03-08 | 2021-04-02 |
| 5.90 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.54 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green and Prism white | Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 281.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 3040 x 1440 pixels | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 551 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.36 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S10 has an overall score of 88.3, which is much better than vivo X60 Pro's 78.8 general score. Both phones in this comparison have the same Android 11 OS (Operating System). The Samsung Galaxy S10 construction is lighter than vivo X60 Pro, although it is a little bit thicker and was released 2 years before.
The vivo X60 Pro counts with just a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy S10, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the vivo X60 Pro also has more RAM. Galaxy S10 has just a bit better looking display than vivo X60 Pro, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per display inch and a better 1440 x 3040 resolution.
Galaxy S10 features a slightly better storage to install games and applications than vivo X60 Pro, because although it has only 128 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB. Vivo X60 Pro has longer battery performance than Galaxy S10, because it has a 24% greater battery capacity.
The vivo X60 Pro has a better camera than Galaxy S10, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is worse for low light photography and video, and they both have the same 60 fps video frame rates and the same (4K) video definition, the vivo X60 Pro also counts with a lot better resolution back facing camera and a much larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.