Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.3 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| 2019-03-08 | 2016-10-20 |
| 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches | 6.09 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.29 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white | Black, Blue and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 408.00 | $ 869.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 435 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.63 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3450mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.12 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S10e has a general score of 86.3, which is a bit better than Google Pixel XL's 81.3 general score. The Samsung Galaxy S10e body is a lot newer, a little thinner and lighter than Google Pixel XL. Galaxy S10e features a little bit better performance than Google Pixel XL, because it has 4 more cpu cores and more RAM memory.
Google Pixel XL counts with a bit better screen than Galaxy S10e, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560px and a quite better quantity of pixels in each inch of display. The Samsung Galaxy S10e features a bit better camera than Google Pixel XL, because although it has a less megapixels resolution camera in the back, a tinier sensor taking worse quality photos and videos and a worse 3840x2160 video resolution, it also counts with a way larger camera aperture for better low light images and videos.
Samsung Galaxy S10e counts with a superior storage capacity to install applications and games than Google Pixel XL, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy S10e also has an external memory slot that allows up to 512 GB. Google Pixel XL has a little better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because it has 3450mAh of battery capacity against 3100mAh.
Galaxy S10e is not only the best phones between the ones we are comparing, but it's also by far the cheapest one, which makes buying this phone an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.