Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.3 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| 2019-03-08 | 2016-09-29 |
| 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches | 6.29 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.29 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 408.00 | $ 115.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 435 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.63 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 29.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3200mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.12 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10e is much better than the LG V20, with a global score of 86.3 against 77. Galaxy S10e is a a lot newer and somewhat lighter cellphone than LG V20, but it's also just a bit thicker. Samsung Galaxy S10e counts with a bit more powerful processing unit than LG V20, because it has a higher number of cores and a higher amount of RAM.
LG V20 counts with a little more vivid screen than Galaxy S10e, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a just a little more pixels per display inch and a higher 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution. The LG V20 features just a bit more storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy S10e, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that admits up to 1,95 TB.
LG V20 has a little better battery life than Galaxy S10e, because it has a 3 percent more battery size. The Samsung Galaxy S10e shoots clearer photographs and videos than LG V20, because although it has a much lower 12 mega pixels resolution back facing camera and a lower video quality, it also counts with a bigger aperture for better low-light photos and a bigger sensor.
Although Samsung Galaxy S10e is a better device, it costs a lot more than the LG V20, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the LG V20. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can get the LG V20, and give up some specs and features, but you will get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.