Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.3 | 79.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| 2019-03-08 | 2017-09-21 |
| 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.29 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white | Black, Blue, Purple and Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 408.00 | $ 307.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 435 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.12 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10e has a score of 86.3, which is slightly better than the LG V30's 79.1 general score. Galaxy S10e is a newer and just a little lighter phone than LG V30, but it is also just a little bit thicker. The LG V30 counts with a slightly better screen than Galaxy S10e, because it has a bit larger display, a better resolution of 1440 x 2880 and a bit more pixels per display inch.
Samsung Galaxy S10e features a little bit better hardware performance than LG V30, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy S10e also has more RAM memory. The Galaxy S10e takes a little bit better pictures and videos than LG V30, because although it has a camera with way less mega-pixels resolution and a lower video quality, it also counts with a bigger camera aperture to take better photography and video in poorly lited environments and a bigger back camera sensor capturing better quality videos and photos.
The LG V30 counts with just a bit bigger storage to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a SD extension slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. LG V30 features a little better battery life than Galaxy S10e, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity against 3100mAh.
Samsung Galaxy S10e costs more money than LG V30, but you can get a better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.