Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.3 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-03-08 | 2019-05-10 |
| 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.29 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white | Aurora black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 408.00 | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 435 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.12 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S10e is a little bit better than the LG V50 ThinQ, getting a score of 86.3 against 83.7. Samsung Galaxy S10e is a somewhat lighter and just a little thinner cellphone than the LG V50 ThinQ, even though they were released with only 2 months difference. LG V50 ThinQ and Galaxy S10e feature really similar processors, both of them have 6 GB of RAM memory and a Octa-Core processor.
LG V50 ThinQ features just a bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because it has a just a little better count of pixels in each inch of screen, a little bit larger display and a higher 1440 x 3120px resolution. LG V50 ThinQ counts with a very superior storage to install applications and games than Galaxy S10e, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory, the LG V50 ThinQ also has a SD memory card expansion slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The LG V50 ThinQ features a camera that's very similar to the Galaxy S10e one, and although the LG V50 ThinQ has a smaller back camera sensor taking less light and dull colors, they both have the same 60 frames per second video frame rates, the same (4K) video definition, a camera in the back with a 12 mega-pixels and the same diafragm aperture.
The LG V50 ThinQ has superior battery lifetime than Galaxy S10e, because it has a 29 percent more battery capacity.
Although Galaxy S10e is a better device, it costs a lot more than the LG V50 ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as LG V50 ThinQ. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can buy the LG V50 ThinQ, and give up a couple features and specs, but you will get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.