Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.3 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2019-03-08 | 2014-10-28 |
| 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 5.29 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white | Black and Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 408.00 | $ 179.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 435 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.3 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.12 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10e has an overall score of 86.3, which is much better than Motorola Droid Turbo's score of 76.4. The Galaxy S10e construction is way newer, lighter and incredibly thinner than the Motorola Droid Turbo. The Motorola Droid Turbo features a better screen than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a higher number of pixels per screen inch and a better 2560 x 1440 resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy S10e has a much greater memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has an external memory card slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB and 128 GB internal memory capacity. Galaxy S10e counts with just a bit better hardware performance than Motorola Droid Turbo, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics co-processor, it also counts with 4 more cpu cores and a larger amount of RAM memory.
Galaxy S10e takes just a bit better photographs and videos than Motorola Droid Turbo, because although it has a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a much less megapixels resolution back-facing camera, it also counts with a lot bigger diafragm aperture. The Motorola Droid Turbo features superior battery performance than Galaxy S10e, because it has 3900mAh of battery capacity instead of 3100mAh.
Although Samsung Galaxy S10e is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Motorola Droid Turbo, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Motorola Droid Turbo. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy Samsung Galaxy S10e, but if you don't you can save some dollars and buy the Motorola Droid Turbo, letting go a couple features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.