Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.3 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2019-03-08 | 2014-10-28 |
| 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 5.29 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white | Black and Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 408.00 | $ 135.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 435 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.3 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.12 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S10e is much better than the Motorola DROID Turbo, having an 86.3 score against 77.9. Samsung Galaxy S10e's design is way newer, a lot thinner and lighter than Motorola DROID Turbo. The Samsung Galaxy S10e has a bit more powerful processor than Motorola DROID Turbo, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics processing unit, it also counts with a greater number of cores (and also faster) and 3 GB more RAM.
Motorola DROID Turbo has a sharper screen than Galaxy S10e, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a greater number of pixels per display inch and a higher 2560 x 1440 pixels resolution. The Samsung Galaxy S10e features much more memory to install applications and games than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that admits a maximum of 512 GB and more internal storage capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy S10e shoots a little bit better pictures and videos than Motorola DROID Turbo, because although it has a way less mega pixels resolution back camera and a worse (4K) video quality, it also counts with a way bigger aperture to capture better captures in low light environments. The Motorola DROID Turbo has superior battery life than Galaxy S10e, because it has a 3900mAh battery size instead of 3100mAh.
Although Galaxy S10e is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Motorola DROID Turbo, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Motorola DROID Turbo. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy Galaxy S10e, else you can save a couple dollars and get the Motorola DROID Turbo, letting go some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.