Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.3 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2019-03-08 | 2024-08-08 |
| 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches | 6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.29 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white | Jungle Green, Koala Gray and Peach Fuzz |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 408.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2712 x 1220 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 435 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 AE (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.12 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10e has a score of 86.3, which is slightly better than Motorola Edge 50's score of 81.2. Galaxy S10e is a lighter phone than Motorola Edge 50, but both of them have the same thickness. Motorola Edge 50 counts with a better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because it has a slightly higher resolution of 1220 x 2712 pixels, a just a little more pixels per inch in the screen and a bigger screen.
Galaxy S10e has a lot better processing power than Motorola Edge 50, although it has less RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Galaxy S10e features a bit more storage capacity for games and applications than Motorola Edge 50, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 512 GB.
Motorola Edge 50 has a really longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3100mAh. The Motorola Edge 50 shoots better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because although it has lower video frame rate and a smaller aperture which is not recommended for capturing images in low light situations, and they both have the same video resolution, the Motorola Edge 50 also counts with a lot larger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a back-facing camera with a lot higher resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.