Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.3 | 79.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-03-08 | 2020-04-16 |
| 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.29 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white | Mystic indigo |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 408.00 | $ 300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 435 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.12 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10e has a global score of 86.3, which is just a bit better than the Moto G Stylus's 79.7 overall score. Galaxy S10e's construction is somewhat thinner and notably lighter than Moto G Stylus, despite of the fact that it was released only 13 months before. The Galaxy S10e counts with a bit more powerful processor than Motorola Moto G Stylus, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S10e also has more RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy S10e has a bit sharper display than Motorola Moto G Stylus, because although it has a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2280 pixels and a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a quite higher display density. Motorola Moto G Stylus shoots much better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because although it has a smaller aperture and worse 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Motorola Moto G Stylus also counts with a camera with a way higher resolution and a way larger back-facing camera sensor which gives a way better image and video quality.
The Galaxy S10e and the Moto G Stylus both count with very similar memory capacity for apps and games, both of them have equal internal memory and a slot for SD memory cards that admits up to 512 GB. Motorola Moto G Stylus counts with superior battery performance than Galaxy S10e, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Galaxy S10e costs more money than Moto G Stylus, but you can get a better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.