Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.3 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-03-08 | 2019-06-06 |
| 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches | 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.29 ounces | 5.82 ounces |
| Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white | Gray and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 408.00 | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 435 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.12 | 5.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10e is just a bit better than Moto Z4, with an 86.3 score against 79.8. Galaxy S10e's design is a little bit thicker but a little lighter than Moto Z4, and both of them were released only 3 months apart. Samsung Galaxy S10e features a little more vivid display than Moto Z4, because although it has a little smaller screen and a bit worse 1080 x 2280 resolution, it also counts with a just a little more pixels per screen inch.
Moto Z4 has as much storage for applications, games, photos and videos as Samsung Galaxy S10e, they have a slot for external memory cards that holds a maximum of 512 GB and the same internal storage capacity. The Samsung Galaxy S10e features a bit superior processor than Moto Z4, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy S10e also has 2 GB more RAM.
Motorola Moto Z4 counts with just a little bit longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because it has a 3600mAh battery capacity instead of 3100mAh. Moto Z4 counts with a superior camera than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because although it has slower 30 fps video frame rate and a smaller diafragm aperture which is not nice for shooting pictures or videos in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Moto Z4 also counts with a lot higher resolution camera in the back and a much bigger back-facing camera sensor taking way higher quality pictures and videos.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, the Galaxy S10e is also very cheap compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.