Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.3 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Oppo |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2019-03-08 | 2021-03-30 |
| 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches | 6.43 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.29 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white | Blue and Gloss Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 408.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 3216 x 1440 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 435 pixels per inch | 526 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.12 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S10e is a little bit better than the OPPO Find X3 Pro, with a general score of 86.3 against 79.9. The Samsung Galaxy S10e is an much older device than the OPPO Find X3 Pro, but Samsung was able to build it just a bit thinner and lighter. The OPPO Find X3 Pro features a little faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy S10e, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the OPPO Find X3 Pro also has more RAM memory.
The OPPO Find X3 Pro has a bit better looking display than Galaxy S10e, because it has a little bit greater pixels density, a larger display and a higher 1440 x 3216 resolution. The OPPO Find X3 Pro captures much better photos and videos than Galaxy S10e, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not recommended for low-light photos and video, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the OPPO Find X3 Pro also counts with a way better 50 MP resolution camera in the back and a way larger camera sensor which provides a lot higher image and video quality.
Samsung Galaxy S10e has a slightly better storage capacity for apps and games than OPPO Find X3 Pro, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that supports up to 512 GB. The OPPO Find X3 Pro features a superior battery life than Galaxy S10e, because it has a 45% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.