Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.3 | 90.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android |
| 2019-03-08 | 2019-09-04 |
| 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches | 6.49 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.29 ounces | 7.27 ounces |
| Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 408.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 435 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.12 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A90 5G is a bit better than the Galaxy S10e, with a 90.5 score against 86.3. Even though Galaxy A90 5G is better than Galaxy S10e, it must be noted that it's also a way heavier and a bit thicker phone. The Samsung Galaxy S10e has a little bit better looking screen than Galaxy A90 5G, because although it has a bit smaller display and a little worse 1080 x 2280 pixels resolution, it also counts with a little bit more pixels per screen inch.
The Galaxy A90 5G features a processing unit that is just as good as the Samsung Galaxy S10e one, they have a 6 GB RAM memory and 8 processing cores. The Samsung Galaxy A90 5G has a superior camera than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because although it has worse video frame rate and a much tinier aperture which is not favorable for low-light captures and video, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Samsung Galaxy A90 5G also counts with a camera with a lot higher resolution and a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor which provides a way better photo and video quality.
The Samsung Galaxy S10e and the Samsung Galaxy A90 5G have quite similar memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos, they have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage and a slot for an SD memory card that supports up to 512 GB. Galaxy A90 5G counts with a superior battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity instead of 3100mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.