Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.3 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2019-03-08 | 2017-02-24 |
| 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches | 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.29 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white | Black and Gold |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 408.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 435 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 7.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 510 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.12 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10e has a global score of 86.3, which is just a bit better than the Galaxy C9 Pro's overall score of 81. Even though Galaxy S10e is thicker than Galaxy C9 Pro, it's much lighter and also incredibly newer. Galaxy S10e counts with a little sharper display than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2280 and a little bit higher screen density.
Samsung Galaxy S10e counts with much more memory capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has more internal storage and a slot for external memory cards that holds up to 512 GB. The Galaxy S10e counts with a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro. Both have a Octa-Core processor and a 6 GB RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy S10e captures better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a camera in the back with a lot lower resolution, it also counts with a lot larger diafragm aperture to take better low light photos and videos and a lot better (4K) video quality. Galaxy C9 Pro counts with longer battery life than Galaxy S10e, because it has a 4000mAh battery size instead of 3100mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.