Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.3 | 79.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Sony |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-03-08 | 2018-10-17 |
| 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches | 6.22 x 2.87 x 0.39 inches |
| 5.29 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 408.00 | $ 900.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 435 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| -- | 550 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 9.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3330mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.12 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10e is a bit better than Xperia XZ3, with an 86.3 score against 79.6. The Galaxy S10e is a way thinner and a lot lighter device than Xperia XZ3, even though both of them were only released 5 months apart. Samsung Galaxy S10e counts with just a little better hardware performance than Sony Xperia XZ3, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Samsung Galaxy S10e also has more RAM memory.
Xperia XZ3 counts with a better display than Galaxy S10e, because it has a higher resolution of 1440 x 2880px, a little bit larger screen and a little bit greater pixel count per screen inch. The Galaxy S10e counts with a lot bigger storage for apps and games than Xperia XZ3, and although they both have an external memory card slot that admits up to 512 GB, the Galaxy S10e also has 128 GB internal memory.
The Sony Xperia XZ3 has just a bit longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because it has a 3330mAh battery capacity instead of 3100mAh. The Sony Xperia XZ3 takes clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy S10e, because although it has lower 30 fps video frame rates and a way tinier diafragm aperture which is not nice for shooting photographs and/or video in low light environments, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Sony Xperia XZ3 also counts with a larger back camera sensor taking better quality videos and pictures and a lot higher 19 mega-pixels resolution camera.
Despite of being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, Galaxy S10e is also very cheap compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.