Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.3 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2019-03-08 | 2024-04-03 |
| 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 5.29 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 408.00 | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 8 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 435 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.12 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S10e is much better than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, having an 86.3 score against 77.8. The Samsung Galaxy S10e is a noticeably older and notably thicker cellphone than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, but Samsung could make it incredibly lighter anyway. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a lot better screen than Galaxy S10e, because although it has a little worse display pixels density, it also counts with a way better resolution of 2200 x 2480 and a lot bigger screen.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a lot bigger memory for apps and games than Galaxy S10e, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage. The Samsung Galaxy S10e has a way better hardware performance than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a very superior battery lifetime than Galaxy S10e, because it has a 5700mAh battery capacity. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a greater camera than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for low light images and videos, it also counts with a way better video definition, a much higher 50 megapixels resolution camera and a way bigger back camera sensor taking much better quality pictures and videos.
Despite of being the best phone in our current comparison, the Galaxy S10e is also by far the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.