Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.3 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| 2019-03-08 | 2018-08-29 |
| 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches | 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.29 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white | Black, Blue and Red |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 408.00 | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2246 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 435 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 16.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.12 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10e has a score of 86.3, which is a bit better than the Xiaomi Pocophone F1's general score of 85.5. Galaxy S10e's design is thinner and somewhat lighter than the Xiaomi Pocophone F1, even when both of them were released only 6 months apart. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with a CPU that is just as good as the Galaxy S10e one, and although the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has more RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor.
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with just a bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because although it has a little lower resolution of 1080 x 2246 and a little bit lower screen density, it also counts with a little bit larger display. Xiaomi Pocophone F1 features a camera that is very similar to the camera in Galaxy S10e, and although the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a way tinier aperture which is not favorable for low light photography, they both have the same sensor size, the same 60 frames per second video frame rates, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a same resolution back facing camera.
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with a bigger memory to install applications and games than Galaxy S10e, because although it has a slot for an external memory card that holds a maximum of 256 GB against 512 GB, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity. Xiaomi Pocophone F1 features greater battery lifetime than Galaxy S10e, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 3100mAh.
Even being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, Galaxy S10e is also cheaper than the other phone, which makes it an easy choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.