Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 85 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-10-02 | 2017-09-22 |
| 6.29 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches | 5.45 x 2.65 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Cloud lavender, Cloud mint, Cloud navy, Cloud orange, Cloud red and Cloud white | Gold, Red, Silver and Space gray |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 509.00 | $ 849.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 4.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1334 x 750 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 326 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.63 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.56 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 1821mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 3.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE is a bit better than iPhone 8, having a general score of 90.8 against 85. The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE body is a lot newer, but notably heavier and somewhat thicker than iPhone 8. The iPhone 8 and Galaxy S20 FE feature really similar displays, although the iPhone 8 has a way lower resolution of 750 x 1334 pixels, a just a little worse pixels number in each inch of screen and a lot smaller screen.
Galaxy S20 FE has more storage to install games and applications than iPhone 8, because although it has only 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that supports up to 1000 GB. IPhone 8 counts with a little faster CPU than Galaxy S20 FE, because although it has an inferior number of cores and 4 GB lesser RAM, it also counts with a 64-bit processing unit.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE features a really longer battery performance than iPhone 8, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity. The Galaxy S20 FE captures clearer pictures and videos than Apple iPhone 8, and although they both have the same video frame rates, a camera in the back with a 12 megapixels resolution, a same size aperture and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Galaxy S20 FE also has a way larger sensor which provides a much higher photo and video quality.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, Galaxy S20 FE is also very cheap compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.