Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-10-02 | 2016-09-29 |
| 6.29 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches | 6.29 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Cloud lavender, Cloud mint, Cloud navy, Cloud orange, Cloud red and Cloud white | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 509.00 | $ 115.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.63 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 29.00mm focal length |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.56 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3200mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE is better than the LG V20, with a general score of 90.8 against 77. Even though Samsung Galaxy S20 FE is notably newer than the LG V20, it's a bit heavier and just a little bit thicker. LG V20 features a little sharper display than Samsung Galaxy S20 FE, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a greater display density and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE has slightly more storage for games and applications than LG V20, because although it has a slot for SD memory cards that supports up to 1000 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 64 GB more internal storage capacity. Galaxy S20 FE has a bit better hardware performance than LG V20, because it has more CPU cores and 2 GB more RAM memory.
The Galaxy S20 FE has a slightly better camera than LG V20, because although it has a worse 3840x2160 video resolution and a back camera with a lot worse resolution, and they both have a same size aperture, the Galaxy S20 FE also counts with a lot larger back-facing camera sensor providing a much better image quality.
The Galaxy S20 FE has a very superior battery life than LG V20, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
Although Galaxy S20 FE is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the LG V20, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as LG V20. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can buy LG V20, giving up a few features and specifications, but you'll get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.