Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2020-10-02 | 2014-10-28 |
| 6.29 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Cloud lavender, Cloud mint, Cloud navy, Cloud orange, Cloud red and Cloud white | Black and Blue |
| Aluminum and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 509.00 | $ 179.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.2 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.56 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE has a global score of 90.8, which is much better than the Motorola Droid Turbo's global score of 76.4. Even though the Samsung Galaxy S20 FE is just a little heavier than the Motorola Droid Turbo, it's notably thinner and also newer. These phones have Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy S20 FE has an older 11 version and Motorola Droid Turbo has Android 4.4.4.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE features a bit better performance than Motorola Droid Turbo, because although it has doesn't have a graphics processing unit, it also counts with a larger number of cores (and also faster) and 3 GB more RAM. Motorola Droid Turbo features a more vivid display than Galaxy S20 FE, because although it has a lot smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels and a higher pixels density.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE counts with a little bit better camera than Motorola Droid Turbo, because although it has a lot worse 12 megapixels resolution camera and a lower video quality, it also counts with a larger diafragm aperture. The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE counts with a superior memory capacity for apps and games than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has a SD card slot that allows a maximum of 1000 GB and 128 GB internal memory capacity.
Galaxy S20 FE features just a little better battery life than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Although Galaxy S20 FE is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Motorola Droid Turbo, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Motorola Droid Turbo. If you are trying to save some money, you can buy Motorola Droid Turbo, letting go a few features and specs, but you'll get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.