Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2020-10-02 | 2014-10-28 |
| 6.29 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Cloud lavender, Cloud mint, Cloud navy, Cloud orange, Cloud red and Cloud white | Black and Blue |
| Aluminum and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 509.00 | $ 135.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.2 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.56 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 FE has a general score of 90.8, which is much better than Motorola DROID Turbo's 77.9 global score. Although the Galaxy S20 FE is just a little bit heavier than Motorola DROID Turbo, it's noticeably thinner and also noticeably newer. These devices use Android operating system, but Galaxy S20 FE has the previous 11 version while Motorola DROID Turbo has Android 4.4.4.
Motorola DROID Turbo features a brighter display than Galaxy S20 FE, because although it has a lot smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 2560 x 1440px and a greater amount of pixels per screen inch. Galaxy S20 FE has just a little better performance than Motorola DROID Turbo, because although it has doesn't have a graphics co-processor, it also counts with a greater number of cores and a larger amount of RAM.
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE takes a bit better photos and videos than Motorola DROID Turbo, because although it has a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a lot less megapixels camera, it also counts with a larger diafragm aperture for better low light captures. The Galaxy S20 FE counts with a much bigger memory to install applications and games than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that admits a maximum of 1000 GB and 64 GB more internal memory capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE features just a bit longer battery life than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Although Galaxy S20 FE is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Motorola DROID Turbo, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Motorola DROID Turbo. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can buy Motorola DROID Turbo, giving up some specs and features, but you'll get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.