Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-10-02 | 2024-08-08 |
| 6.29 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches | 6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Cloud lavender, Cloud mint, Cloud navy, Cloud orange, Cloud red and Cloud white | Jungle Green, Koala Gray and Peach Fuzz |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 509.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2712 x 1220 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 AE (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.56 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE has an overall score of 90.8, which is much better than Motorola Edge 50's score of 81.2. Both of these devices use Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy S20 FE has an older 11 version while Motorola Edge 50 has Android 14. Despite being the best in this comparison review, it must be told that it is also noticeably older, just a little thicker and a little bit heavier.
Motorola Edge 50 features a more vivid screen than Galaxy S20 FE, because it has a little bit more pixels per screen inch, a bit higher resolution of 1220 x 2712 and a little bit larger screen. The Galaxy S20 FE counts with a way better processing power than Motorola Edge 50, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
Motorola Edge 50 shoots better photos and videos than Galaxy S20 FE, because although it has slower 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same aperture, the Motorola Edge 50 also counts with a camera in the back with much more mega pixels and a bigger back-facing camera sensor which gives a better photo and video quality.
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE has more memory capacity to install applications and games than Motorola Edge 50, because although it has only 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external SD slot that holds a maximum of 1000 GB. Motorola Edge 50 features just a bit better battery duration than Galaxy S20 FE, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.