Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 79.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-10-02 | 2020-04-16 |
| 6.29 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches | 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Cloud lavender, Cloud mint, Cloud navy, Cloud orange, Cloud red and Cloud white | Mystic indigo |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 509.00 | $ 300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.56 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE is much better than Moto G Stylus, having a 90.8 score against 79.7. Samsung Galaxy S20 FE's design is just a little bit lighter and a little thinner than the Moto G Stylus, although they were released only 6 months apart. Both of these phones have the same Android 11 OS, so both of them should give all the same operating system features.
The Galaxy S20 FE features a bit more vivid display than Moto G Stylus, because it has a slightly better 1080 x 2400px resolution, a little bit greater screen density and a little larger screen. The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE features a little better processing power than Moto G Stylus, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Samsung Galaxy S20 FE also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
Galaxy S20 FE counts with a slightly better storage to store more apps and games than Moto G Stylus, and although they both have equal internal storage, the Galaxy S20 FE also has an external memory slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB. The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE has a little longer battery life than Moto G Stylus, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
Motorola Moto G Stylus shoots slightly better photographs and videos than Galaxy S20 FE, because although it has worse video frame rate and a smaller back camera sensor capturing worse quality videos and photographs, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Motorola Moto G Stylus also counts with a back facing camera with a lot higher 48 mega pixels resolution and a larger camera aperture to capture better photos and video in low light situations.
The Galaxy S20 FE costs a lot more than Motorola Moto G Stylus, but you can get a better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.